home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- @Q01
-
- ┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
- │ IS MY COMPANY POTENTIALLY SUBJECT TO THE │
- │ PERSONAL HOLDING COMPANY PENALTY TAX? │
- └──────────────────────────────────────────┘
- Many years ago, the tax laws were amended to keep wealthy
- individuals from "incorporating their pocketbooks," e.g.,
- putting their stocks, bonds, and other investments into
- corporations, in order to take advantage of the much lower
- corporate tax rates that obtained at the time. Now, nearly
- six decades later, corporate tax rates are generally higher
- than the rates individuals pay.
-
- But old tax laws never die, once they are on the books. As
- a result, the tax law still imposes a "personal holding
- company" (or "PHC") penalty tax at a rate of 39.6% on the
- "undistributed PHC income" of companies that are determined
- to be personal holding companies.
-
- QUESTION: Is your business incorporated (or will it be) ?
- @YN
- 01\Q03
- 02\Q02
-
- @Q02
-
- CONCLUSION: Then you do not have to be concerned about the
- personal holding company tax problem. It only applies to
- corporations.
-
- @STOP
-
- @Q03
-
-
- QUESTION: Is your corporation an S corporation?
-
- @YN
- 01\Q04
- 02\Q05
-
- @Q04
-
- CONCLUSION: Then your corporation is not subject to the
- personal holding company provisions, which apply only to
- "C corporations," and not to "S corporations."
-
- @STOP
-
- @Q05
-
- OTHER EXEMPT CORPORATIONS. Certain other special kinds of
- corporations are exempted from the personal holding company
- tax. These include the following kinds of corporations:
-
- . banks;
-
- . life insurance companies and surety companies;
-
- . certain lending or finance companies that meet
- special tests;
-
- . foreign personal holding companies (these come
- with their own distinct set of tax problems);
-
- . tax-exempt organizations, and various other
- special kinds of corporations.
-
- QUESTION: Does your corporation fall within any of the above
- exemptions (or any others that you know apply)?
- @YN
- 01\Q06
- 02\Q07
-
- @Q06
-
- CONCLUSION: Then, as such an entity, your corporation does
- not need to be concerned with the personal holding company
- tax, due to its special status.
-
- @STOP
-
- @Q07
-
- STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT. Your corporation will not be
- treated as a personal holding company unless its stock is
- controlled by a very small number of people, directly or
- indirectly. The rules for determining when stock in a company
- is "indirectly" owned by someone are extremely complex and
- difficult to work with, so you may need to consult a tax
- professional if you aren't sure whether the corporation is
- over 50% owned, directly or indirectly, by 5 or fewer people.
-
- Otherwise, just assume that, for example, any stock in the
- corporation in question that you own, or that is owned by
- your family, or by corporations, trusts, or partnerships in
- which you have an interest, will probably be "attributed" to
- you, and the same goes for any other person who may have
- indirect ownership of some of the stock.
-
- QUESTION: Do 5 or fewer individuals own, directly
- or indirectly, more than 50% of the total
- outstanding stock of the company in question?
- @YN
- 01\Q09
- 02\Q08
-
- @Q08
-
- CONCLUSION: Then the corporation is not a "personal holding
- company," since its stock is too widely held. Thus, so long
- as no 5 or fewer individuals own over 50% of the stock
- (including indirect ownership that is "attributed" to them),
- the company will not be subject to the personal holding
- company tax.
-
- CAUTION: As noted above, the PHC stock ownership and stock
- attribution rules are VERY complex and tricky. Thus,
- before you blithely assume that you escape the PHC rules
- on account of the stock ownership test, you may wish to
- consult your tax adviser.
-
- Of course, just because 5 or fewer people own, or are
- considered to own, over 50% of a corporation does not
- mean that the corporation is a PHC, if it does not have
- significant "personal holding company income." Thus,
- you may want to go through this Question & Answer session
- again, and next time answer "YES" to the stock ownership
- question, just to see if you would escape the PHC definition
- based on the type of income your corporation generates.
-
- @STOP
-
- @Q09
-
- PERSONAL HOLDING COMPANY INCOME: If your C corporation
- derives 60% or more of its "adjusted ordinary gross income"
- ("AOGI") from certain types of income, such as rents,
- annuities, interest or dividends, it may be subject to the
- federal "personal holding company tax." Other kinds of PHC
- income to be considered in this 60% test are:
-
- . most kinds of royalties, plus "produced film rents"
-
- . amounts received for use of corporate property
- (tangible property) by a 25% or greater shareholder
- of the corporation; and
-
- . income received from certain personal service contracts
- (such as an athlete or entertainer, for example), where
- the designated performer owns 25% or more of the stock.
-
- QUESTION: Is personal holding company income 60% or more
- of "adjusted ordinary gross income" ("AOGI") ?
- @YN
- 01\Q11
- 02\Q10
-
- @Q10
-
- CONCLUSION: Then it would appear that your corporation does
- not currently have a personal holding company tax problem,
- since its items of "personal holding company income," as
- listed above, amount to less than 60% of "adjusted ordinary
- gross income." Looked at another way, your company is free
- of personal holding company tax problems if over 40% of its
- ordinary gross income each tax year comes from some kind
- of active business income, such as sales of merchandise or
- income from rendering personal services, for example.
-
- @STOP
-
- @Q11
-
- TENTATIVE CONCLUSION: Then your company may be in danger
- of having to pay a 39.6% personal holding company tax on any
- after-tax PHC income that it fails to distribute as dividends
- to shareholders. However, not all is necessarily lost, if
- over 50% of its ordinary gross income ("OGI") or adjusted
- ordinary gross income ("AOGI"), depending on the category,
- comes from any ONE of the following specific categories:
- . rents -- if over 50% of AOGI is from "adjusted income
- from rents";
- . mineral/oil/gas royalties--if, as adjusted, they are
- over 50% of AOGI;
- . copyright royalties (other than from works by
- shareholders)--if such qualifying royalties
- constitute over 50% of OGI;
- . active business computer software royalties -- if they
- constitute over 50% of OGI;
- . "produced film rents"--if over 50% of the company's OGI.
- QUESTION: Does your firm qualify under one or
- more of the above 50% tests?
- @YN
- 01\Q13
- 02\Q12
-
- @Q12
-
- FURTHER CONCLUSION: Then it seems, from the answers you
- have given, that your corporation may very well have a
- personal holding company tax problem.
-
- If so, this means that you have two practical choices, if
- you cannot find some way to escape PHC status:
-
- (1) Pay the 39.6% penalty tax on any personal holding
- company income that is not distributed to shareholders.
- Note that in computing the amount of undistributed
- personal holding company income, for purposes of
- the tax, you start with TAXABLE INCOME of the
- corporation, reduced by federal income taxes accrued
- for the year, and make several other adjustments,
- two of the major ones being:
-
- . The corporation is not allowed a net operating
- loss deduction (except for a loss incurred in
- the preceding year); and
-
- . It is not allowed the 70% or 80%
- dividends-received deduction for dividend
- income from stock investments.
-
- (2) Pay out all of the personal holding company income
- (as adjusted, per the preceding paragraph) as
- dividends to shareholders. This will avoid the
- personal holding company tax, but will still result
- in double taxation, of course, since you would be
- paying out all of the after-tax income of the
- corporation, essentially, and the shareholders
- would pay individual income tax on the dividends
- they received -- Not exactly a wonderful result either!
-
- PLANNING SUGGESTIONS:
-
- . Try to zero out net income of the corporation by paying
- the largest salaries you feel that you can justify, to
- shareholder-employees. In many PHC situations, however,
- where most of the income is from passive investments,
- you may be likely to run into "reasonable compensation"
- problems with this approach, where the IRS takes the
- position that salaries are excessive, and therefore are
- really dividends in disguise. In that case, the IRS
- will disallow the excess or "unreasonable" compensation
- as a deduction to the corporation, so that you're right
- back in the soup.
-
- . Have the corporation elect S corporation status, if
- it is eligible to make such election. S corporations
- are not subject to the personal holding company tax.
- However, even if S corporation status can be elected,
- a company that had PHC problems is very likely to have
- lots of "passive income" that may be subject to the
- special S corporation tax, all at the highest corporate
- tax rate -- 35% -- (where "passive investment income"
- exceeds 25% of gross receipts). If so, it will only
- be allowed to continue as an S corporation for three
- years before it is disqualified. Also, there can be
- other drawbacks in electing S corporation status, which
- you would need to consider, such as triggering certain
- "built-in gains," LIFO recapture (from having used
- the LIFO method of inventory accounting), and other
- potential tax traps for the unwary and the poorly
- advised.
-
- . A more aggressive approach would be to have the
- corporation go into some kind of active business, where
- it generates gross revenues that exceed 40% of its
- ordinary gross income. Such a new business does not
- even need to show a net profit: If it generates GROSS
- revenues that are more than 40% of "adjusted ordinary
- gross income," your personal holding company tax problem
- is solved. (This could backfire on you of course, if
- the new business LOSES a ton of money -- Saving on taxes
- isn't the only thing to consider.)
-
- @STOP
-
- @Q13
-
- FURTHER CONCLUSION: Then you MAY be exempt from the personal
- holding company tax, if your firm also meets a number of
- other complex definitional requirements (each different)
- that apply to each of the 5 categories of special types of
- PHC income. For example, for some of the categories, the
- business must have certain types of business expenses that
- exceed 15% (for mineral, oil & gas royalties) or 25% (for
- active business computer software royalties) of OGI or AOGI.
-
- Also, for several of the categories, other types of PHC
- income must not exceed 10% of the ordinary gross income
- (OGI). Numerous other complex requirements apply, so it is
- strongly recommended that you DO NOT, based on this
- information, conclude that you don't have a PHC tax problem
- just because you think you qualify under one of the 50%
- exceptions. You will definitely need to consult a competent
- tax professional for expert help in determining if your
- corporation meets one of the 50% tests and all the related
- requirements for avoiding treatment of your major category
- of income as personal holding company income.
-
- The only conclusion you should draw on your own at this
- point is that you MAY have a shot at avoiding PHC status;
- but heed this advice:
-
- . SEE YOUR TAX ADVISER ABOUT THIS.
-
- . THIS IS NOT THE TIME OR PLACE FOR "DO-IT-YOURSELF"
- BRAIN SURGERY.
-
- . YOU ARE IN VERY DEEP WATER HERE!
-
- @STOP
-
- @HELP
-
- @H\01
-
- Answer "YES" ("Y") to this question
- even if you are not incorporated, but
- are at least seriously considering the
- possibility of incorporating. (Then
- answer the questions that follow AS IF
- your business were incorporated.)
-
- @H\03
-
- An S corporation is simply a regular
- corporation that has filed an election
- with the IRS (on Form 2553) to be taxed
- under the provisions of Subchapter S of
- the Internal Revenue Code. That is, it
- has chosen to have its income or losses
- "pass through" and be taxable to (or
- deducted by) its shareholders, rather
- than paying income taxes at the
- corporate level.
-
- @H\05
-
- Other corporations exempted from the PHC
- provisions include:
-
- . Small Business Investment Companies,
- if no shareholders own a 5% or more
- interest in any small business to
- which the SBIC provides funds.
-
- . Certain foreign corporations, if all
- their stock is owned, during the
- last half of the taxable year, by
- non-resident aliens and/or foreign
- entities owned by non-resident
- aliens.
-
- @H\07
-
- Note that, even if you only hold an
- option to acquire stock of the company,
- you are considered as already owning
- the stock subject to the option, for
- purposes of the PHC attribution rules.
- These rules on indirect stock ownership
- are very wide-reaching, and hard to get
- around.
-
- @H\09
- "Adjusted Ordinary Gross Income" is the
- ordinary GROSS income (excluding capital
- gains) of a corporation, before any
- deductions, except certain adjustments
- applicable to rental income and mineral
- and oil and gas royalty income (such as
- depreciation or depletion, property tax,
- interest and rents paid), and other
- various adjustments that apply only to
- certain kinds of special taxpayers and
- types of income. Rather technical!
-
- (You may want to simply look at gross
- income less capital gains, for a rough
- idea of whether you have a PHC problem.)
- @H\10
-
- PLANNING TIP: If your company has a PHC
- tax problem, or is close to the line,
- under the 60% test, one way to solve the
- PHC problem would be for the corporation
- to enter some kind of active business as
- a sideline. Such a new business does not
- even need to show a net profit: If it
- generates GROSS revenues that are more
- than 40% of the corporation's adjusted
- ordinary gross income, the personal
- holding company tax problem is solved.
-
- @H\11
-
- NOTE: Each of these five categories has
- its own set of special, different, and
- very complex requirements, which are far
- too detailed to go into here. However,
- if your business clearly generates most
- of its revenues from one of the 5 listed
- categories, enter "YES", since you might
- have a good chance of qualifying under
- that special exception to the personal
- holding company tax provisions.
-
- @END
-
-
-